東南アジア学会

東南アジア学会の皆様

10月17日午後3時半から下記の要領でアブバカル・エビハラ氏（ジェンベル大学
講師、京都大学東南アジア研究所研究員）を招いて、インドネシアにおけるイス
ラーム条例制定の動きに関するセミナーを開催いたします。興味をお持ちの方は
ご参加ください。

Title：
Legalizing Shari'a (Islamic Law) and Its Impact on the 'Pancasila
State' in Indonesia: the Case of Shari'a Regulations (Perda Shari'a)

Speaker：
Dr. Abubakar Eby Hara (CSEAS visiting research fellow and
Lecturer, Faculty of Social Science and Political Sciences,
University of Jember)

Commentator:
Heru Susetyo　（API Fellow, Lecturer, Faculty of Law,
University of Indonesia)

Time & Date: 15:30 - 17:30, October 17 (Tues.), 2006

Place:
Room 207 (2nd floor of East building, CSEAS(Center for Southeast
Asian Studies, Kyoto University)

Abstract：

This presentation examines the durability of new Indonesia democracy
based on Pancasila ideology in facing efforts to form an Islamic
state. In last effort after being unsuccessful to get support in
national level, the supporters of pro-Islamic state use autonomy
system in Indonesia to promote shari'a regulations in some districts and
cities. In contrast to the New Order regime which restricted
categories that could be discussed in public, the current regime
responds to this demand by attempting to find place for such effort.
The shari'a regulations are not annulled by the central government but
are given opportunity to people to decide. The pro and anti-shari'a
exponents have debated the issues by referring to Pancasila ideology.
The pro-shari'a claims that the implementation of Islamic shari'a is
part of proving that Pancasila is not a secular ideology but the
anti-shari'a argues that any laws produced in Indonesia should apply to
all and not for a certain religious group. After an intense debate in
public, the pro-shari'a found the fact that their arguments derived from
religious justifications cannot be acceptable for all Indonesians. The
changes in form of debate and persuasion of pro-shari'a groups can be
seen from their arguments that the shari'a regulations are actually not
shari'a regulations but only regulations inspired by interpretation of
shari'a living in society. The case discussed in this paper shows that
the new Indonesia democracy is durable enough to accommodate demands in
society but it also shows that the process to find rational and
justified arguments for legal policies in Indonesia politics still
continue and Pancasila is still accepted as a political platform
although it has not become what Rawls mentioned as an 'overlapping
consensus' among Indonesians.

Contact:
okamoto masaaki